Case 1: Mr. West wants his students to truly understand Civil War battles. He engages the help of a local Historical Re-enactment Society and assigns each of his students to the Union or Confederate side. His students join the re-enactors from 7:00am-7:00pm for a full day of activities which include a long march (complete with rudimentary battle gear), setting up camp, cooking over campfires, scouting territory, and engaging in a historically representative battle.
1
. After participating in this activity, what do you think the students will remember? How might those memories differ from those students would have if they only read about the Civil War in their textbook? After participating in this activity, I feel that the students will remember much more than the students who just read a text book. When one simply reads a text book, you are only getting one of the senses involved, & more than likely you would want to use some type of learning method to help one learn & remember the concept being learning. Such as, rehearsal, visual imagery, elaboration, etc. Thought, the student participating in the activity in a sense are actually "doing." They are getting themselves involved actually doing what the soldiers did. This in my opionion gets more of the senses involved & more of your motor skills. Your brain is more likely going to remember something you actually did, vs something you just read in a book. Not to say that reading the text is band, though actually "doing" when at all possible I feel would be more beneficial.
2. How does Mr. West’s use of a Civil War re-enactment engage students’ emotions? What is the relationship between emotions and learning? Well, it invokes the process of meaningful learning, As the students are able to recognize something that they may already know about the subject. Once they begin to do the reenactment, they are able to relate to things. Though, if they feel something for the subject at hand, if it touches them in a way or if they can relate it to something, they would be able to grasp that information better. Because once they have a connection to something, they are more likely to be more interested in it, thus wanting to learn more about it. It peaks there interest, which is always a good thing.
3. Based on the principles of dual-coding theory, what activities would be effective for Mr. West to use as a follow-up to the re-enactment? As a follow up, you could quite possibly have the students do their own re-enactment. Or quite possible have them interview a family member, or someone they know that has been in a war and present their finding to the class. Or, have the interviewed person come and speak to the class.
Case 2: Mr. Dunkin and Mr. Richards, teachers at the same school, are debating in the teacher’s lounge about who provides the best type of organization for the students’ learning. Mr. Dunkin lectures and assigns reading and chapter problems Mondays through Thursdays. On Fridays he gives a short answer exam. In Mr. Richards’ class the students never know what will take place on any given day until they arrive in class and look at a detailed outline of the hour’s activities on the chalkboard. His class engages in mix of role-plays, lecture, videos, group projects and demonstrations. Mr. Richards occasionally gives surprise quizzes and his unit tests can include true/false, multiple choice, short answer, or essay.
4. Who do you think provides better instruction for his students? Support your answer from an information processing perspective I feel that Mr. Dunkin provides the better instruction. I only say this because I feel that the students would be better organized. During their cognitive processes, they would be better able to form categories, identify certain things and be able to find things better in their memories. Versus the other class who doesn't really know what to expect. When put on the spot, they might not be able to locate certain things in their memory since they wouldn't be as organized as the other students.
5. How would you expect the students’ learning outcomes to differ depending on which teacher they had? I would dare say that Mr. Dunkins students would have learned better. They would be more organized and would probably be able to locate certain things in their memory much quicker, versus Mr. Richards class. Though, now that I think about it, I feel would have been a little bit more of a rote learning style. They don't really know what is going to happen, though when they get to class, they get a topic and they attach meaning to something without making sense to it first. Though, if they would have had time to prepare, they would know ahead of time, what they are attaching the information to.